logo

PureVPN vs PIA: Which VPN Is Better in 2026?

These two land in the same search because they cost about the same, and that is where the resemblance stops. PureVPN is the cheaper subscription to hold onto: it renews at roughly $48 a year where PIA renews at about $57, and it reached more Netflix libraries than PIA in 2026 testing. PIA is the better VPN by almost every other measure, and unusually it is the one whose claims you can check without trusting anybody. We scored them across seven rounds using the same data behind our reviews of each, and it finished six rounds to one. The scorecard below shows which one PureVPN took, and why it might be the one you care about.

7 rounds · 41 specs compared · Winner: PIA

PureVPN vs PIA at a Glance

PureVPN

Best for the cheapest bill to keep, and non-US Netflix

  • $2.15/mo for 27 months, renews at only $4.00
  • Netflix, Disney+, Prime and iPlayer all unblocked
  • 31-day refund window and ISO 27001 certified

$2.15/moon the 2-year Standard plan · $12.95 monthly

Get PureVPNRead our full PureVPN review →
Our pick

PIA

Best for proof, unlimited devices and the bigger network

  • Unlimited simultaneous devices on every plan
  • Three Deloitte audits and two court cases, all clean
  • 100% open-source apps, including a real Linux GUI

$2.03/moon the 2-year plan · $11.95 monthly

Get PIARead our full PIA review →

Our verdict

PIA wins 6 rounds to 1

PIA takes this six rounds to one. It is faster in our tests, runs five times the servers across more countries, ships apps you can read the source of, publishes three Deloitte no-logs audits in full, has twice produced nothing when a US court asked, includes port forwarding, and places no cap on devices. PureVPN wins the round about money, and it wins it properly: about $48 a year at renewal against $57, a cheaper one-year rate, and roughly $8 less over the first three years. If the VPN is going on every device in the house and you want its promises to be verifiable, buy PIA. If you want the smallest recurring bill and you mainly want non-US Netflix, PureVPN is a defensible choice, with one caveat you should read the privacy round before ignoring.

Pick PureVPN if

you plan to keep the subscription for years and want the smallest renewal bill, you want non-US Netflix catalogues more than anything else on this page, or you want a jurisdiction outside the Five Eyes alliance.

Pick PIA if

you want apps whose source you can read and audits you can actually download, you are covering more than ten devices, you torrent and want port forwarding included, you need a server in a specific US state, or you want the faster of the two.

PureVPN vs PIA: Side-by-Side Specs

PureVPN and PIA compared specification by specification
SpecificationPureVPNPIA
Pricing
Cheapest plan$2.15/mo · 27 months for $58.20$2.03/mo · 28 months for $56.94 (wins this row)
1-year plan$2.55/mo · 16 months for $40.80 (wins this row)$3.33/mo · 12 months for $39.95
Month to month$12.95$11.95 (wins this row)
Renewal after the intro termAbout $48 a year (wins this row)About $57 a year
First 3 years all-inAbout $106 for 39 months (wins this row)About $114 for 40 months
Money-back guarantee31 days (wins this row)30 days
Network and speed
Servers6,000+30,000+ (wins this row)
Coverage as each publishes it80+ locations · 65+ countries91 countries · about 105 locations (wins this row)
Speed loss in our testsAbout 25%About 15% (wins this row)
A server in all 50 US statesNoYes (wins this row)
ProtocolsWireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2 (wins this row)WireGuard, OpenVPN
ObfuscationObfuscation modeShadowsocks proxy
Privacy and trust
JurisdictionBritish Virgin Islands · no data-retention law (wins this row)United States · inside Five Eyes
Parent companyGZ Systems · run from KarachiKape Technologies · adware until 2018
No-logs audits4 · all KPMG, latest April 2024 (wins this row)3 · all Deloitte, latest 2025
Audit reportsNone published · report page now 404sPublished in full, downloadable (wins this row)
Current auditor namedNo · "a well-known audit firm"Yes · Deloitte Audit Romania (wins this row)
Open-source appsNoYes · every client (wins this row)
Tested by a courtYes · gave the FBI connection logs in 2017Yes · produced nothing in 2016 and 2018 (wins this row)
Latest transparency reportWarrant canary conflicts with the report30 legal requests in Q4 2025 · no data given (wins this row)
Security features
Kill switchYes · not in the iOS appYes · three modes on desktop (wins this row)
Split tunnellingWindows and Android onlyWindows, macOS, Linux, Android (wins this row)
Port forwarding$0.99/mo add-onIncluded · all non-US servers (wins this row)
Multi-hopNoYes · via Shadowsocks or SOCKS5 (wins this row)
RAM-only serversNot publishedYes (wins this row)
Dedicated IP$2.99/mo add-on$2.50/mo add-on (wins this row)
DDoS protection$3.99/mo add-on (wins this row)Not offered
CertificationISO 27001 (wins this row)None on record
Streaming and torrenting
Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, iPlayer, HuluAll unblockedAll unblocked
Netflix libraries reliably reachedUS, UK, Japan, Canada, Germany (wins this row)Dependable on US · others need switching
HBO MaxNot in our dataUnblocked (wins this row)
Dedicated streaming serversNo · standard serversYes (wins this row)
Smart TV appsApple TV, Android TV, Fire TVApple TV, Android TV, Fire TV, Chromecast (wins this row)
TorrentingAllowed · port forwarding costs extraAllowed · port forwarding included (wins this row)
SOCKS5 proxy for torrent clientsNoYes (wins this row)
Devices and support
Simultaneous connections10 on every planUnlimited on every plan (wins this row)
Games consolesPlayStation, XboxPlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo Switch (wins this row)
Router supportManual setup · uses 1 of 10Manual setup · uses no slot (wins this row)
Linux appCommand lineOpen-source GUI and command line (wins this row)
Browser extensionsChrome, Edge, FirefoxChrome, Firefox, Opera
Support24/7 live chat and email24/7 live chat and email

A tick marks the provider that wins the row. Rows without one are a draw.

Round 1: Price and renewal cost

Winner: PureVPN

PIA is cheaper to start, PureVPN is cheaper to keep.

On the sticker price PIA is ahead, and only just. Its two-year plan works out at $2.03 a month, $56.94 covering 28 months once the four free months are counted, against PureVPN’s $2.15 a month, $58.20 covering 27 months. Month to month PIA is $11.95 against $12.95. Neither gap would move anyone on its own, and both are introductory rates that expire.

The round turns on what happens after that, which is where most of the money in a VPN subscription actually changes hands. PureVPN Standard renews at $47.95 a year, about $4.00 a month. PIA renews at roughly $57, about $4.75, and that figure is not published on its pricing page and drifts with promotions, so treat it as a ballpark and put the date in a calendar. Over a first term plus one renewal, PureVPN costs about $106 for 39 months against PIA’s $114 for 40, and PureVPN’s one-year plan is the cheaper of the two at $2.55 a month against $3.33. Add a refund window a day longer, 31 days against 30, and PureVPN takes four rows to two. It is a narrow win on small sums, but it is the one round where PureVPN is straightforwardly the better buy.

Round 2: Speed

Winner: PIA

PIA gives up 15% of a connection, PureVPN 25% or worse.

Both default to WireGuard, so this is a question of capacity and routing rather than protocol. In our testing PIA gives up about 15% of an unprotected line and PureVPN about 25%, and those are the two figures on the cards above. Ten points is a real difference rather than a rounding error: on a 500 Mbps connection it is the gap between roughly 425 and 375 Mbps, and it widens on anything already constrained.

The honest version is that the gap is probably wider still. Independent 2026 testing put PureVPN at about 65% of a 945 Mbps baseline on same-country WireGuard routes, a loss nearer 35% than 25%, and our own gaming guide carries 34% for it from an earlier snapshot. PIA measures the other way: independent testing has it holding 85% to 92% of baseline on nearby WireGuard servers, which is better than the 15% loss we record. Neither provider is in the top tier for speed, and both lose a lot of throughput on genuinely distant servers, which is PIA’s own listed weakness as much as PureVPN’s. But every source we checked orders them the same way, and none of them puts PureVPN in front.

Round 3: Privacy and trust

Winner: PIA

One was tested in court and passed. The other was tested and failed.

PureVPN starts this round ahead on paper and loses it on the record. Its address is the better one: the British Virgin Islands has no data-retention law and sits outside the intelligence-sharing alliances, while PIA is a United States company inside Five Eyes with no legal shield against a retention order. PureVPN has also been audited more often, four KPMG no-logs engagements between 2019 and April 2024, and its always-on arrangement, which lets an auditor inspect production servers without notice, is the strongest audit design either provider has described. Two of those advantages are worth having and we have ticked both.

Everything a reader can actually verify goes the other way. PureVPN’s transparency report page is gone, none of the four audit reports is published, and the company no longer names the firm running the always-on arrangement, calling it "a well-known audit firm". Its warrant canary and its transparency report do not agree with each other. And in 2017 it handed connection logs to the FBI in the Ryan Lin cyberstalking case while advertising a no-logs policy, which is the only outcome on this page where a provider was tested and failed. PIA was tested twice, in US proceedings in 2016 and 2018, and produced nothing usable either time. Its three Deloitte engagements under ISAE 3000, the latest completed in 2025 by Deloitte Audit Romania, are downloadable in full, its Q4 2025 transparency report records 30 legal requests and no data disclosed against any of them, and every client is open source. A better address does not beat a worse record.

Round 4: Security features

Winner: PIA

PIA includes what PureVPN sells as add-ons, and covers more platforms.

The split here is about what comes in the box. PIA includes port forwarding on all its non-US servers, offers multi-hop by chaining the VPN through a Shadowsocks or SOCKS5 proxy, runs MACE for ad and tracker blocking at the DNS level, and confirms RAM-only servers, all at the subscription price. PureVPN sells port forwarding as a $0.99 a month add-on, has no multi-hop, and prices a dedicated IP at $2.99 against PIA’s $2.50. Its one clear feature win is DDoS protection, a $3.99 a month add-on that PIA does not sell at any price, and its one clear credential win is ISO 27001 certification, which PIA does not hold.

The other half of the round is coverage rather than count. PIA’s kill switch has three modes on desktop and its split tunnelling works on Windows, macOS, Linux and Android. PureVPN’s split tunnelling is Windows and Android only, and by its own listed shortcoming its iOS app has neither a kill switch nor split tunnelling, which is exactly the platform where a leak is hardest to notice. Independent testing has also found DNS leaks on PureVPN servers, which is a bad result for a feature both providers advertise. A reader who specifically wants DDoS protection or an ISO certificate should ignore our scoring here, but on everything else PIA takes the round five rows to two.

Round 5: Streaming and torrenting

Winner: PIA

PureVPN reaches more Netflix regions, PIA wins everything else.

PureVPN wins the row most people came for and still loses the round. Both unblock Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, BBC iPlayer and Hulu, so access is not the difference. Reach is: in 2026 testing PureVPN worked on the US, UK, Japanese, Canadian and German Netflix catalogues, where PIA is dependable on the US library and often needs a few server changes to land elsewhere. If the catalogue you want is not the American one, that single fact may outweigh the rest of this page, and we would not argue with you.

PIA takes the round on breadth. Our data has it unblocking HBO Max where PureVPN’s record does not, it runs a dedicated set of streaming locations rather than routing you through general-purpose servers, and its television lineup adds Chromecast to the Apple TV, Android TV and Fire TV apps both providers ship. Torrenting is not close at all. Both allow P2P, but PIA includes port forwarding on every non-US server and offers a SOCKS5 proxy for torrent clients, while PureVPN charges $0.99 a month for port forwarding and has no proxy equivalent. Five rows to one, with the one being the row a Netflix-driven reader should weigh hardest.

Round 6: Devices and support

Winner: PIA

Unlimited connections against ten, and more hardware covered.

PIA removed its ten-connection cap in 2023, and its own support documentation, updated in April 2026, confirms one subscription now covers an unlimited number of simultaneous devices with no feature restrictions attached. PureVPN allows ten, which is above the industry norm and is genuinely enough for most households, but the two are not comparable: ten is a number you eventually have to think about and unlimited is not. On a house with televisions, consoles, a partner’s laptops and a router, that is the difference between arithmetic and none.

The hardware around the cap goes the same way. PIA covers Chromecast alongside Apple TV, Android TV and Fire TV, supports all three console families to PureVPN’s two, and its router install consumes no connection slot because there are no slots to consume. Its Linux app has a maintained graphical client as well as a command line, which is rare and which matters to the people who ask for it. Browser extensions are a wash, three each, and support is a genuine tie: both run 24/7 live chat alongside email, so a connection that dies on a Saturday night gets a human on either side. Five rows to nil with two ties.

Round 7: Server network

Winner: PIA

Five times the servers, more countries, and all 50 US states.

PIA runs over 30,000 servers, our own figure, against PureVPN’s 6,000. The two companies count their coverage differently and we have not converted either: PureVPN publishes 80-plus locations across 65-plus countries, while PIA publishes 91 countries across about 105 locations and has stopped publishing a server total at all, which is why our figure and PIA’s own "35,000+" marketing do not match. Whichever unit you prefer, PIA is the larger network by roughly five to one on servers and by a clear margin on countries.

The specific thing that capacity buys here is US granularity. PIA puts a server in all 50 US states, which no other provider at this price does, and that is not a novelty: it is how you reach a regional broadcaster, keep a bank from flagging a login while you travel, or appear in a state whose laws differ from the one you are sitting in. PureVPN has no equivalent. Raw server count is a blunt instrument and a bigger network is not automatically a faster one, but on this pairing the bigger network is also the faster one, so there is no trade-off to weigh. The round is not close.

PureVPN and PIA in Detail

PureVPN: Best for the cheapest bill to keep, and non-US Netflix

3.7
Privacy
Features
User Score

PureVPN loses this comparison and is still the right answer for one specific reader: the one who intends to keep a VPN for years and wants the smallest possible bill. It renews at about $48 a year against PIA’s $57, its one-year rate is the cheaper of the two, and its refund window is a day longer. It also reached more Netflix libraries than PIA in 2026 testing, which matters if the catalogue you want is not the American one. Against that, its privacy story is the weaker one in every way a reader can check. It handed connection logs to the FBI in 2017 while advertising a no-logs policy, its four KPMG audits are no longer published anywhere, and it will not name the firm running its always-on arrangement. It is also slower, smaller, closed source, and it charges extra for port forwarding.

Renewal price
About $48 a year on Standard
Speed loss in our tests
25%
No-logs audits
4 no-logs engagements · KPMG, latest April 2024
Jurisdiction
British Virgin Islands
Parent company
GZ Systems · run from Karachi · also owns Ivacy
Protocols
WireGuard · OpenVPN · IKEv2
Streaming
Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, BBC iPlayer, Hulu
Simultaneous devices
10 on every plan
Servers
6,000+ in 80 locations

Pros

  • $2.15/mo for 27 months, renews at only $4.00
  • Netflix, Disney+, Prime and iPlayer all unblocked
  • 31-day refund window and ISO 27001 certified
  • 10 devices, 6,000 servers across 65+ countries
  • Auditor can inspect production servers unannounced

Cons

  • Audit reports unpublished; trust page won’t name KPMG
  • No kill switch or split tunneling in the iOS app
  • Advertised per-month price is not what you are billed

$2.15/moon the 2-year Standard plan · $12.95 monthly

Get PureVPNRead our full PureVPN review →

PIA: Best for proof, unlimited devices and the bigger network

4.4
Privacy
Features
User Score

PIA wins six of the seven rounds, and it wins them on evidence rather than on marketing. Every client is open source, three Deloitte no-logs engagements are published in full rather than described, and it has twice been asked for user records by US courts and had nothing to give. It is the faster of the two in our tests, it runs five times the servers across more countries, it puts a server in all 50 US states, it includes port forwarding that PureVPN charges for, and it places no cap at all on simultaneous devices. The reservations are real and neither is technical. It is a United States company, inside Five Eyes, with no legal shield against a data-retention order, and it belongs to Kape Technologies, which distributed adware until 2018. It is also the more expensive of the two to keep once the intro term ends.

Renewal price
About $57 a year
Speed loss in our tests
15%
No-logs audits
3 no-logs engagements · Deloitte, latest 2025
Jurisdiction
United States · inside Five Eyes
Parent company
Kape Technologies · also owns ExpressVPN, CyberGhost
Protocols
WireGuard · OpenVPN
Streaming
Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, BBC iPlayer, Hulu, HBO Max
Simultaneous devices
Unlimited on every plan
Servers
30,000+ in 91 locations

Pros

  • Unlimited simultaneous devices on every plan
  • Three Deloitte audits and two court cases, all clean
  • 100% open-source apps, including a real Linux GUI
  • Port forwarding on all non-US servers
  • 91 countries, plus a server in all 50 US states

Cons

  • US jurisdiction, no VPN data-retention shield
  • Owned by Kape, an adware distributor until 2018
  • Long-distance servers lose most of the connection

$2.03/moon the 2-year plan · $11.95 monthly

Get PIARead our full PIA review →

How We Compared PureVPN and PIA

Plan prices, server counts, device limits, speed figures, scores and the pros and cons come from our own review database, the same data behind the PureVPN and PIA review pages on this site. Both records were in good order on this pairing and nothing had to be discarded as false, which is not something we have been able to write about every provider. Three sets of figures have no home in that database and were verified by hand on September 8, 2026: the renewal prices, the three-year cost of ownership, and the add-on charges for port forwarding, dedicated IPs and DDoS protection. Renewal in particular is the number that decides the price round, so we have checked it and said plainly where it is a ballpark rather than a published rate.

Rounds are decided on the facts in the table, not on overall impressions, and a round is a tie when the ticked rows come out level. Where our own speed figures and independent testing disagree we have said so in the round rather than quietly picking the flattering number, and where the two providers count their networks in different units we have printed each in its own unit rather than converting one into the other. PureVPN’s 2017 disclosure to the FBI and PIA’s two court appearances are both matters of public record. The links here are affiliate links and they fund the testing; both providers pay commission and the round-by-round scoring is set before any of that is looked at. Neither provider saw this page before publication.

PureVPN vs PIA FAQ

PIA, by six rounds to one. It is faster in our tests, runs about five times as many servers across more countries, ships apps whose source code anyone can read, publishes three Deloitte no-logs audits in full, includes port forwarding, and places no limit at all on simultaneous devices. PureVPN wins the money round: it renews at roughly $48 a year against PIA’s $57, its one-year rate is cheaper, and its refund window is a day longer. Pick PureVPN if the smallest recurring bill is the priority or you want non-US Netflix catalogues. Pick PIA for almost anything else.

It depends on when you ask. PIA is cheaper to start: $2.03 a month on its two-year plan, $56.94 covering 28 months, against PureVPN’s $2.15 and $58.20 for 27 months, and $11.95 month to month against $12.95. PureVPN is cheaper to keep. It renews at $47.95 a year, about $4.00 a month, while PIA renews at roughly $57, about $4.75. Over a first term plus one renewal that is about $106 for PureVPN against $114 for PIA. PureVPN’s one-year plan is also the cheaper of the two, $2.55 a month against $3.33.

Yes. In our testing PIA gives up about 15% of an unprotected connection and PureVPN about 25%, and every independent source we checked orders them the same way. Some put the gap wider: 2026 WireGuard testing had PureVPN retaining roughly 65% of a 945 Mbps line, a loss closer to 35%, while PIA has been measured holding 85% to 92% of baseline on nearby servers. Both default to WireGuard, so the difference is capacity and routing rather than protocol. Neither is a top-tier performer, and both lose a lot of throughput on genuinely distant servers.

PIA, despite having the worse address. PureVPN is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, which has no data-retention law, while PIA is a United States company inside the Five Eyes alliance. But PIA has been asked for user records by US courts twice, in 2016 and 2018, and produced nothing usable either time; its three Deloitte no-logs audits are published in full; and every client is open source. PureVPN handed connection logs to the FBI in 2017 while advertising a no-logs policy. It has since been audited four times by KPMG, but none of those reports is published, its transparency report page now returns a 404, and it will not name the firm running its always-on audit.

PIA places no limit at all. It removed its ten-connection cap in 2023, and its support documentation, updated in April 2026, confirms unlimited simultaneous connections on every plan with no features held back. PureVPN allows ten, which is above the industry average and is enough for most households, but a router install consumes one of those ten while on PIA it consumes nothing. Both count simultaneous connections rather than installations, so you can put the app on as many machines as you like on either service. PIA also covers all three console families and adds Chromecast to the television apps both providers ship.

PureVPN, and it is the one row on the page where it clearly beats PIA. Both unblock Netflix, Disney+, Prime Video, BBC iPlayer and Hulu, so this is about reach rather than access. In 2026 testing PureVPN worked on the US, UK, Japanese, Canadian and German Netflix catalogues, while PIA is dependable on the US library and often needs a few server changes to land elsewhere. PIA answers with a dedicated set of streaming locations, HBO Max in our data where PureVPN’s record has none, and a Chromecast app. If a specific non-US catalogue is the reason you want a VPN, PureVPN is the better bet.

Largely, yes. Both offer a money-back guarantee on new subscriptions, 31 days on PureVPN and 30 on PIA, so you can buy the other one, run it for a few weeks and refund whichever you like less. Check the terms before you rely on it: PureVPN says it will try to resolve the problem before processing a refund, and purchases made through app stores or third-party deal sites are handled by the payment processor rather than the provider on both services. The trap on either side is auto-renewal, because the advertised rate covers the first term only. PureVPN renews at about $48 a year and PIA at about $57.

More Head-to-Head Comparisons