
NordVPN
Best for speed, streaming and the wider feature set
- Fastest VPN in independent tests
- Six Deloitte-audited no-logs engagements
- Unblocks Netflix, iPlayer, Disney+, HBO Max
This is the closest of the big VPN comparisons, because the two providers are optimised for different things and both are good at what they chose. NordVPN is the performance product: faster on the servers most people use, better at streaming, deeper in features, and answerable on live chat at any hour. ProtonVPN is the accountability product: every client open source, five published no-logs audits, the larger network, port forwarding, and a free plan that is genuinely usable. We scored them across seven rounds using the same data that sits behind our reviews of each, and it finished four rounds to three. The scorecard below shows exactly which three you would be buying.
7 rounds · 39 specs compared · Winner: NordVPN
Best for speed, streaming and the wider feature set

Best for open-source privacy, a real free plan and port forwarding
Our verdict
NordVPN takes it four rounds to three, and the margin is honest rather than decorative. It wins speed on nearby servers, security features, streaming and the devices-and-support round, which together describe what using a VPN feels like day to day. ProtonVPN wins price, privacy and network size, which together describe what you are actually buying. If you want the VPN that performs best, buy NordVPN. If you want the VPN whose claims you can independently check, that costs about $55 a year less to keep, and that runs on more of the world’s internet, buy ProtonVPN. Neither answer is wrong here, which is not something we get to write often.
Pick NordVPN if
you want the fastest connection to servers near you, you stream a lot and want more Netflix regions without buffering, you need a games console covered without a router, or you want 24/7 live chat when something breaks.
Pick ProtonVPN if
you want open-source clients and audit reports published in full, you need port forwarding for torrenting or gaming, you would rather pay about $84 a year than $139, or you want to try a free plan with unlimited data before paying anything.
Round by round
NordVPN 4ProtonVPN 3Ties 0
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| Cheapest plan | $3.49/mo · 2-year Basic | $2.99/mo · 2-year Plus (wins this row) |
| 1-year plan | $5.49/mo | About $4.49/mo (wins this row) |
| Month to month | $14.99 | $9.99 (wins this row) |
| Renewal after the intro term | About $139 a year on Basic | About $84 a year on Plus (wins this row) |
| Free plan | None | Unlimited data · 5 countries · 1 device (wins this row) |
| Money-back guarantee | 30 days, refunded in full (wins this row) | 30 days, prorated to unused days |
| Network and speed | ||
| Servers | 8,900+ | 20,000+ (wins this row) |
| Coverage as each publishes it | 224 locations | 130+ countries (wins this row) |
| Speed loss in paired 2026 testing | About 16% (wins this row) | About 35% |
| Nearby server on a 1 Gbps line | 903 Mbps · Seattle (wins this row) | 698 Mbps · Seattle |
| Distant servers (Australia, Japan) | Slower of the two | Faster of the two (wins this row) |
| Protocols | NordLynx (WireGuard), OpenVPN | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, Stealth (wins this row) |
| Privacy and trust | ||
| Jurisdiction | Panama · no data-retention law (wins this row) | Switzerland · surveillance ordinance pending |
| Parent company | Nord Security | Proton AG |
| No-logs audits | 6 · all Deloitte, latest Nov–Dec 2025 (wins this row) | 5 · all Securitum, latest May 2026 |
| Open-source apps | No | Yes · every client (wins this row) |
| Audit reports | Released to account holders | Published in full by the auditor (wins this row) |
| Other certification | None on record | SOC 2 Type II (wins this row) |
| Known incident | 2018 breach of one rented server, no user data | None on record (wins this row) |
| Security features | ||
| Kill switch | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-hop | Double VPN · preset pairs | Secure Core · company-owned hardened data centres (wins this row) |
| Tor over VPN | Onion Over VPN servers | Tor servers, one click |
| Obfuscation | Obfuscated servers (wins this row) | Stealth · not on Linux or routers |
| Ad and malware blocking | Threat Protection Pro · scans downloads · Plus and up (wins this row) | NetShield · DNS level · every paid plan |
| Device-to-device mesh | Meshnet (wins this row) | No |
| Password manager | NordPass on Plus and up | Proton Pass on Unlimited |
| Streaming and torrenting | ||
| Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max, iPlayer, Prime Video | All unblocked | All unblocked |
| Netflix libraries reliably reached | 15+ (wins this row) | About 10 |
| Playback in testing | No buffering (wins this row) | Full HD with occasional loading delays |
| Smart TV apps | Apple TV, Android TV, Fire TV, Nvidia Shield (wins this row) | Apple TV, Android TV, Fire TV |
| Smart DNS for consoles | SmartPlay, included (wins this row) | None · router setup required |
| Torrenting | Standard and P2P-optimised servers (wins this row) | Dedicated P2P servers only |
| Port forwarding | No | Yes · on P2P servers (wins this row) |
| Devices and support | ||
| Simultaneous connections | 10 on every plan | 10 on every paid plan · 1 on Free |
| Apps | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS |
| Browser extensions | Chrome, Firefox, Edge | Chromium-based and Firefox-based browsers |
| TV and console reach | Four TV platforms · consoles via SmartPlay (wins this row) | Three TV platforms · consoles via router |
| Router support | Manual setup · full protocol set (wins this row) | Manual setup · no Stealth |
| Support | 24/7 live chat and email (wins this row) | Email and tickets · no 24/7 live chat |
A tick marks the provider that wins the row. Rows without one are a draw.
Cheaper monthly, cheaper at renewal, and there is a free plan.
ProtonVPN is the less expensive subscription at every term we could verify. Month to month it is $9.99 against NordVPN’s $14.99, which is the widest proportional gap on the page and the one that matters if you genuinely intend to pay monthly. On the annual plan it is about $4.49 a month against $5.49, and on the two-year plan about $2.99 against $3.49. NordVPN wins one row here, the refund: both offer 30 days, but NordVPN returns the full amount while Proton prorates to the days you did not use.
The round is decided at renewal, which is where most of the money in a VPN subscription changes hands. ProtonVPN Plus renews at $83.88 every 12 months, about $6.99 a month. NordVPN Basic renews at roughly $139, which our own review lists as the biggest single complaint against it. That is about $55 a year, every year, for as long as you keep the subscription. Then there is the plan NordVPN does not have at all: Proton’s free tier carries unlimited data across five countries on one device, with the server chosen for you. It is the only free plan from a major provider that is not a trial in disguise, and it means you can test Proton for nothing before deciding. On price, Proton wins clearly.
NordVPN is faster where most people connect, though not everywhere.
Both run WireGuard at the core, NordVPN through its NordLynx implementation, so this is a question of capacity and routing rather than protocol. In paired 2026 testing on a gigabit line NordVPN reached 903 Mbps in Seattle to Proton’s 698, and 825 Mbps in New York to Proton’s 524. The gap narrows sharply in the UK, 658 against 614, which is a rounding error in practice. Averaged across those three, NordVPN gives up about 16% of an unprotected line and ProtonVPN about 35%, and those are the two figures on the cards above.
The picture is not one-directional, and anyone quoting a single number for this pairing is flattening it. Measured as a global average across every region rather than three Western locations, the two are within two points of each other, roughly 62% retention against 60%, and ProtonVPN is the faster of the two on distant servers in Australia and Japan. NordVPN also has a known weakness of its own on upload to far endpoints. So the accurate statement is that NordVPN is faster where most of its customers connect, which is near home, in Europe and in the US, and that Proton closes or reverses the gap the further you go. On the ordinary case, NordVPN takes the round.
Open source and published audits beat a better address.
NordVPN has the better jurisdiction and the longer audit count. It is incorporated in Panama, which has no data-retention law and belongs to none of the intelligence-sharing alliances, and it has been through six no-logs assurance engagements since 2018, all by Deloitte, the latest between 10 November and 12 December 2025. That is a serious record and it wins two rows here. It also carries one old scar: a rented server in Finland was breached in 2018, with no user data on it.
ProtonVPN wins the round on what a reader can verify without taking anyone’s word for it. Every Proton VPN client is open source, so the code that handles your traffic can be read and rebuilt; NordVPN’s cannot. Its five consecutive annual Securitum no-logs audits, the latest conducted over three days in May 2026, are published in full at the auditor’s own site rather than released to account holders, and it holds a SOC 2 Type II on top. Against that sits the one thing genuinely moving: Switzerland. A proposed revision to the OSCPT surveillance ordinance would require user identification and up to six months of data retention for services with more than 5,000 users. It is a pending ordinance, not law. Proton has said publicly it would leave the country if it passes, moved most of its physical infrastructure out from July 2025 and is building in Norway. We have marked it as pending rather than counted it against either side, because it has not happened. On the evidence available today, Proton is the more provable of the two.
Deeper toolkit, though Secure Core and port forwarding are real gaps.
The foundations are level. Both ship a kill switch, split tunnelling, RAM-only infrastructure, a full-tunnel DNS, and one-click routing into the Tor network, Onion Over VPN on one side and Tor servers on the other. Where they part company first is multi-hop, and Proton has the better version: Secure Core routes your traffic through hardened data centres the company owns outright in privacy-friendly countries before it exits, which is a stronger design than choosing from NordVPN’s preset Double VPN pairs.
Past that the depth is NordVPN’s. Its obfuscation is available on more platforms than Proton’s Stealth protocol, which is missing from Linux and from router configurations, exactly the setups most likely to need it. Threat Protection Pro scans downloads for malware rather than only filtering at the DNS level as NetShield does, though NordVPN gates it to Plus and above while Proton includes NetShield on every paid plan. And Meshnet, which builds a private encrypted mesh between your own devices, has no Proton equivalent at any price. Proton’s counter is port forwarding, which NordVPN does not offer anywhere and which matters for torrenting and for hosting. On breadth NordVPN takes the round, but a reader who specifically wants Secure Core or port forwarding should ignore our scoring here.
More libraries, smoother playback, and consoles without a router.
Both unblocked Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max, BBC iPlayer and Prime Video in testing, so the difference is not access, it is reach and smoothness. NordVPN reliably reaches more than fifteen Netflix regions to Proton’s ten or so, and played back without buffering where Proton delivered full HD with occasional loading delays. Both put native apps on Apple TV, Android TV and Fire TV; NordVPN adds Nvidia Shield. The gap that decides it is consoles: NordVPN includes SmartPlay smart DNS at no extra cost, so a PlayStation or Xbox is a settings change, while ProtonVPN has no smart DNS at all and sends you to a router.
Torrenting splits the other way and Proton wins the part of it that people actually complain about. It offers port forwarding on its P2P servers; NordVPN offers it nowhere. In paired testing a 264 MB torrent finished in 67 seconds on Proton against 132 on NordVPN. NordVPN’s answer is availability rather than throughput: P2P is allowed on its standard servers, while Proton confines it to a dedicated subset, so you spend less time checking whether the server you picked will work. Two strong torrenting rows are not enough to overturn five streaming ones, so the round goes to NordVPN, but a heavy torrenter should read this one backwards.
Level on connections, ahead on television, consoles and live chat.
The headline number is a genuine tie, which is unusual on this page: ten simultaneous connections each, on every paid plan, with Proton’s free tier limited to one. Both have apps for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS, and both offer browser extensions, NordVPN for Chrome, Firefox and Edge and Proton for Chromium-based and Firefox-based browsers. Proton’s clients are open source and its Linux app has a maintained GUI as well as a command-line client, which is a real advantage for anyone who cares about either.
NordVPN wins on reach past the desktop and on what happens when something breaks. Its television lineup adds Nvidia Shield, and SmartPlay covers consoles without a router where Proton needs one. Both support manual router installation and neither sells its own hardware, but Proton loses its Stealth protocol on a router while NordVPN keeps its full protocol set. Support is the clearest gap and Proton’s own review data concedes it: NordVPN runs 24/7 live chat alongside email, while ProtonVPN is email and tickets, so a connection that fails on a Saturday night waits. Three rows to nil with three ties gives NordVPN the round.
More than twice the servers, and far wider country coverage.
ProtonVPN runs over 20,000 servers in more than 130 countries, its own figure as of April 2026, and independent coverage has reported the country count climbing past that since. NordVPN runs around 8,900 servers across 224 locations. The two companies count differently, which is why the table labels each side with the unit it actually publishes and converts neither, but the comparison survives either translation: Proton has more than twice the servers and reaches substantially more of the world. Both networks are RAM-only, so a machine that is seized or unplugged loses its contents.
Raw count is a blunt instrument, and NordVPN’s smaller network is the faster one in the places we measured, so this round is not a proxy for performance. What country coverage buys is the ability to appear somewhere specific, and that is not a niche need: it is how you reach a broadcaster that only serves one market, keep a bank from locking an account while you travel, or get a usable connection somewhere the big providers have never bothered to place a server. On that measure the gap is not close, and it is the main reason Proton is the one to look at if your requirement is a particular country rather than a particular speed.
NordVPN wins this comparison on the things you notice every day rather than the things you can audit. It is faster on the servers most people actually connect to, it reaches more Netflix regions and holds them without buffering, it puts a smart DNS on games consoles that Proton has no answer to, and it answers a 3am support question on live chat. The feature list is deeper too: Meshnet, obfuscated servers and a threat engine that scans downloads rather than only filtering DNS. What it is not is the more transparent or the cheaper of the two. The clients are closed source, the renewal is roughly $139 a year, and there is no free plan and no port forwarding anywhere in the product. Buy it because it is the better-performing VPN, not because it is the more provable one.
Pros
Cons
ProtonVPN loses on performance and wins on everything you can check for yourself. Every client is open source, five consecutive Securitum no-logs audits have been published in full rather than handed to account holders, and there is a SOC 2 Type II on top. It runs the larger network of the two, over 20,000 servers in 130+ countries, it renews at about $84 a year against roughly $139, it offers port forwarding that NordVPN does not, and its free plan is the only genuinely useful one in the mainstream market: unlimited data, five countries, one device. The costs are real. It is slower on nearby servers, it reaches fewer Netflix regions, consoles need a router, support is email and tickets with no 24/7 live chat, and its Swiss base is under a proposed surveillance ordinance the company has said it would leave the country over.
Pros
Cons
Plan prices, server counts, device limits, protocols and the pros and cons normally come from our own review database, the same data behind the NordVPN and ProtonVPN review pages on this site. On this pairing that was only half possible: our ProtonVPN record had gone badly out of date, to the point of listing a server count more than fifteen times too low and claiming the service has no WireGuard support, so every Proton figure on this page was replaced with one verified against Proton’s own published disclosures on September 7, 2026, and the record has been flagged for correction. The NordVPN figures are current and unchanged.
The two speed percentages come from a single paired test of both providers on the same gigabit line, averaged across Seattle, New York and the UK, so they are comparable to each other rather than to figures elsewhere on this site. Rounds are decided on the facts in the table, not on overall impressions, and a round is a tie when the ticked rows come out level. Switzerland’s proposed surveillance ordinance is marked as pending because it has not passed, and is not counted against either provider. The links here are affiliate links and they fund the testing; both providers pay commission and the round-by-round scoring is set before any of that is looked at. Neither provider saw this page before publication.
NordVPN, by four rounds to three, and it is the closest result we have scored. NordVPN wins speed on nearby servers, security features, streaming and the devices-and-support round, which between them describe what using a VPN feels like day to day. ProtonVPN wins price, privacy and server network. Pick NordVPN if you want the better-performing product, more Netflix regions, consoles covered without a router and 24/7 live chat. Pick ProtonVPN if you want open-source apps and audit reports published in full, port forwarding, coverage in far more countries, or a renewal bill of about $84 a year instead of $139.
ProtonVPN, at every term. Month to month it is $9.99 against NordVPN’s $14.99, on the annual plan about $4.49 a month against $5.49, and on the two-year plan about $2.99 against $3.49. The gap that matters most is renewal: ProtonVPN Plus renews at $83.88 a year, about $6.99 a month, while NordVPN Basic renews at roughly $139, so from the second term onward Proton costs about $55 a year less. ProtonVPN also has a free plan with unlimited data on one device, which NordVPN does not offer at all. Both refund within 30 days, though NordVPN refunds in full and Proton prorates.
In most places, yes, but it depends where you connect. In paired 2026 testing on a gigabit line NordVPN reached 903 Mbps in Seattle against ProtonVPN’s 698, and 825 Mbps in New York against 524. In the UK the two were close, 658 against 614. Averaged across those three, NordVPN gives up about 16% of an unprotected connection and ProtonVPN about 35%. Measured as a global average across every region, though, the two sit within two points of each other, and ProtonVPN is the faster of the two on distant servers in Australia and Japan. Both run WireGuard, so the difference is capacity and routing rather than protocol.
ProtonVPN, on the evidence you can check yourself. Every Proton VPN client is open source, its five consecutive annual Securitum no-logs audits are published in full by the auditor rather than released to account holders, and it holds a SOC 2 Type II as well. NordVPN has the better address, Panama, which has no data-retention law and sits outside the intelligence-sharing alliances, and a longer record of six Deloitte engagements since 2018, but its apps are closed source. The live question is Switzerland: a proposed revision to the OSCPT surveillance ordinance would require user identification and up to six months of data retention. It has not passed, Proton has said it would leave the country if it does, and it has already moved most of its infrastructure out.
Ten each, on every paid plan, which makes this one of the few specs where the two are genuinely level. ProtonVPN’s free plan is limited to one device. Both count simultaneous connections rather than registered devices, so you can install the app on as many machines as you like and only ten can be connected at once. Both also support manual installation on a compatible router, which covers everything on your Wi-Fi through a single connection, and neither sells its own router hardware. On ProtonVPN a router setup gives up the Stealth protocol; on NordVPN the full protocol set is available.
NordVPN. Both unblocked Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max, BBC iPlayer and Prime Video in our checks, so this is about reach and smoothness rather than access. NordVPN reliably reaches more than fifteen Netflix regions to ProtonVPN’s ten or so, and played back without buffering where Proton delivered full HD with occasional loading delays. Both have native apps for Apple TV, Android TV and Fire TV, and NordVPN adds Nvidia Shield. For a games console the difference is larger: NordVPN includes SmartPlay smart DNS at no extra cost, so a PlayStation or Xbox needs only a settings change, while ProtonVPN has no smart DNS and requires a router.
Largely, yes. Both offer a 30-day money-back guarantee on new subscriptions, so you can buy the other one, run it for a few weeks and refund whichever you like less. Read the terms first, because they differ: NordVPN refunds the full amount, while ProtonVPN prorates the refund to the days you did not use. ProtonVPN also has a free plan with unlimited data, so you can try it for as long as you like before paying anything. On both sides the trap is auto-renewal, since the intro price covers the first term only. That matters more for NordVPN, at roughly $139 a year against ProtonVPN’s $84.