
NordVPN
Best for speed, audits and the deeper privacy toolkit
- Fastest VPN in independent tests
- Six Deloitte-audited no-logs engagements
- Unblocks Netflix, iPlayer, Disney+, HBO Max
NordVPN and Surfshark have shared a parent company since February 2022, which makes this the strangest of the big VPN comparisons: two products from the same group, run by separate teams on separate networks, sold to two different people. NordVPN is the faster, more heavily audited and more feature-complete of the two, and it charges for it. Surfshark costs less at every term, renews at about half the price, and places no limit at all on how many devices you connect. We scored them across seven rounds using the same data that sits behind our reviews of each, and the scorecard below shows exactly where the money goes.
7 rounds · 39 specs compared · Winner: NordVPN
Best for speed, audits and the deeper privacy toolkit

Best for covering every device in a house for the least money
Our verdict
NordVPN takes this four rounds to two. It is faster, it has three times the no-logs audit history, it operates from Panama rather than a Nine Eyes country, and it runs roughly twice the network, with Onion Over VPN and Meshnet that Surfshark has no answer to. Surfshark wins the two rounds that decide most actual purchases. It is cheaper at every term and renews at about $79 a year against roughly $139, and it puts no cap on connections, so one subscription covers a whole house and a router install costs nothing. The short version: NordVPN is the better VPN, Surfshark is the better buy, and unusually for this pair of sentences, both companies get your money either way.
Pick NordVPN if
you want the fastest connection, the deepest audit trail and a Panama jurisdiction, or you specifically want Onion Over VPN, Meshnet or a threat engine that scans downloads rather than just blocking domains.
Pick Surfshark if
you are covering more than ten devices or a whole household, you want the VPN on a router without spending a connection slot, or you would rather pay about $79 a year than $139 for a difference of a few percent in speed.
Round by round
NordVPN 4Surfshark 2Ties 1
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | ||
| Cheapest plan | $3.49/mo · 2-year Basic | $2.49/mo · 2-year Starter (wins this row) |
| 1-year plan | $5.49/mo | $3.39/mo (wins this row) |
| Month to month | $14.99 (wins this row) | $16.45 |
| Renewal after the intro term | About $139 a year on Basic | About $79 a year on Starter (wins this row) |
| Plan tiers | Basic, Plus, Complete, Prime · same VPN on all | Starter, One, One+ · same VPN on all |
| Money-back guarantee | 30 days | 30 days |
| Network and speed | ||
| Servers | 8,900+ (wins this row) | 4,500+ |
| Coverage as each publishes it | 224 locations (wins this row) | 100 countries · around 140 locations |
| Speed loss in our tests | 16% (wins this row) | 20% |
| Independent 2026 speed retention | About 86% of baseline (wins this row) | About 80% of baseline |
| Protocols | NordLynx (WireGuard), OpenVPN | WireGuard, OpenVPN, IKEv2, Dausos (wins this row) |
| Post-quantum encryption | Yes · ML-KEM on NordLynx | Yes · hybrid scheme on Dausos |
| Privacy and trust | ||
| Jurisdiction | Panama · outside the Eyes alliances (wins this row) | Netherlands · Nine Eyes member |
| Parent company | Nord Security | Nord Security · merged in 2022 |
| No-logs audits | 6 · all Deloitte, latest Nov–Dec 2025 (wins this row) | 2 · Deloitte, 2023 and June 2025 |
| Server types in the latest no-logs audit | Standard, Double VPN, Onion Over VPN, obfuscated (wins this row) | Standard, static and multiport |
| Real-world legal test | None on record | Dutch court warrant, Apr 2026 · no activity data held (wins this row) |
| Known incident | 2018 breach of one rented server, no user data | None on record (wins this row) |
| Security features | ||
| Kill switch | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-hop | Double VPN · preset pairs | MultiHop · custom entry and exit pairs (wins this row) |
| Tor over VPN | Onion Over VPN servers (wins this row) | No |
| Obfuscation | Obfuscated servers | Camouflage Mode and NoBorders |
| Ad and malware blocking | Threat Protection Pro · scans downloads · Plus and up (wins this row) | CleanWeb · blocks domains · every plan |
| Device-to-device mesh | Meshnet (wins this row) | No |
| Identity tools | Dark web monitor on Plus and up | Alternative ID and Rotating IP (wins this row) |
| Antivirus | Download scanning only | Full antivirus on One and One+ (wins this row) |
| Password manager | NordPass on Plus and up (wins this row) | No |
| Dedicated IP | Paid add-on | Paid add-on |
| Streaming and torrenting | ||
| Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max, iPlayer, Prime Video | All unblocked | All unblocked |
| Smart TV apps | Apple TV, Android TV, Fire TV, Nvidia Shield (wins this row) | Apple TV, Android TV, Fire TV |
| Smart DNS for consoles | SmartPlay, included | Smart DNS, included |
| Torrenting | Standard and P2P-optimised servers | Every server in the network (wins this row) |
| Port forwarding | No | No |
| Devices and support | ||
| Simultaneous connections | 10 on every plan | Unlimited on every plan (wins this row) |
| Router support | Manual setup · uses one of your 10 slots | Manual setup · uses no slot (wins this row) |
| Apps | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS |
| Browser extensions | Chrome, Firefox, Edge | Chrome, Firefox, Edge |
| Consoles | PlayStation, Xbox, Switch via router or SmartPlay | PlayStation, Xbox, Switch via router or Smart DNS |
| Support | 24/7 live chat and email | 24/7 live chat and email |
A tick marks the provider that wins the row. Rows without one are a draw.
Cheaper to start, and cheaper to keep by about $60 a year.
Surfshark is the less expensive subscription at almost every point on the pricing page. Its two-year Starter plan is $2.49 a month against NordVPN’s $3.49 for Basic, and its one-year plan is $3.39 against $5.49, which is the widest gap of the three terms. NordVPN wins one row here, the month-to-month rate, at $14.99 against Surfshark’s $16.45, and if you genuinely intend to pay by the month that is the one figure that matters. Both refund within 30 days and both take Bitcoin.
The gap that decides the round opens at renewal, which is where most of the money in a VPN subscription actually changes hands. Surfshark Starter renews at about $79 a year regardless of which intro term you bought. NordVPN Basic renews at roughly $139, which our own review lists as the single biggest complaint against it. That is about $60 a year, every year, for the life of the subscription, and it buys a few percent of throughput and a longer feature list. The tier ladders tell the same story on both sides: the VPN itself is identical on every plan, and the extra money buys antivirus, identity tools and, on Surfshark One+, Incogni data removal. On price, Surfshark wins and it is not close.
NordLynx keeps more of your bandwidth, on a bigger network.
Both are fast enough that on an ordinary home connection neither will announce itself, so this round is decided on margins. In our data NordVPN loses 16% of baseline throughput and Surfshark loses 20%, and independent 2026 testing lands in the same order: NordVPN averaged around 780 Mbps to Surfshark’s 680, retaining roughly 86% of an unprotected line against roughly 80%. Both run WireGuard at the core, NordVPN through its NordLynx implementation, so the difference is not the protocol so much as the amount of capacity behind it.
Surfshark has a live counter-argument in Dausos, its own protocol launched in 2026 with post-quantum key exchange and a claimed 30% speed improvement, audited by Cure53 in February and March 2026 with no Critical or High findings. It is a genuinely interesting piece of engineering and it may close this gap; today it has not. NordVPN’s own weakness is upload on distant servers, where our review measured a sharp drop, so if you push large files to far-away endpoints the ranking can invert. On the ordinary case of downloading through a nearby server, NordVPN is the faster of the two.
Panama and six audits against the Netherlands and two.
Start with the fact that makes this pairing unusual: they have the same owner. Surfshark merged with Nord Security in February 2022, so buying one instead of the other is not the diversification it looks like, and the spec table scores that row a tie because it is literally the same answer twice. The two run separate infrastructure, apps and engineering teams, and that separation is real, but anyone choosing between them for corporate reasons should know there is nothing to choose.
On everything else NordVPN is ahead. It is incorporated in Panama, which has no data-retention law and belongs to none of the intelligence-sharing alliances; Surfshark is in the Netherlands, a Nine Eyes member. NordVPN has been through six no-logs assurance engagements since 2018, all by Deloitte, the latest carried out between 10 November and 12 December 2025 across its standard, Double VPN, Onion Over VPN and obfuscated servers. Surfshark has two, in 2023 and June 2025, covering standard, static and multiport servers. Surfshark holds the one piece of evidence NordVPN cannot match: on 14 April 2026 an Amsterdam District Court warrant compelled it to produce what it had on an account, and all it had was confirmation the account existed and the payment details, because it stores no activity data. That is a no-logs policy tested in court and it earns Surfshark the row. NordVPN’s record is not spotless either, with one rented server breached in Finland in 2018 and no user data on it. Weighing jurisdiction and audit depth against one passed warrant and one old breach, NordVPN takes the round.
Closer than the scoreline: NordVPN edges it on reach, Surfshark on inclusion.
The basics are level. Both ship a kill switch, split tunnelling, obfuscation for networks that block VPN traffic, RAM-only servers, a post-quantum key exchange (ML-KEM on NordLynx, a hybrid scheme on Dausos) and a dedicated IP as a paid add-on. Both have multi-hop, and Surfshark’s is arguably the better version since late 2025, because you can build custom entry and exit pairs rather than pick from presets. Surfshark’s obfuscation is the more automatic of the two: Camouflage Mode engages itself with OpenVPN and NoBorders detects a restricted network and surfaces the servers that still work, which is more useful than a server list when you do not yet know what is blocking you. Against that, Surfshark is the less reliable of the two in China, at roughly 65% connection success in independent testing.
Past the basics each has things the other simply lacks. NordVPN has Onion Over VPN, which drops you onto Tor from a VPN server; Meshnet, which builds a private mesh between your own devices; and NordPass on Plus and above. Its Threat Protection Pro scans downloads for malware rather than only blocking domains, and scored a 92% phishing block rate with no false positives in AV-Comparatives’ January 2026 test, though it is gated to Plus and above. Surfshark counters with Alternative ID and Rotating IP, a full antivirus on One and One+, and CleanWeb included on every plan rather than sold up a tier. Neither offers port forwarding. NordVPN wins on the strength of Onion Over VPN and Meshnet, which have no Surfshark equivalent at any price, but this is the round where a reader who wants antivirus and a masked identity in the base package should ignore our scoring and buy Surfshark.
Both unblock everything worth asking for.
Each unblocked Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max, BBC iPlayer and Prime Video in our checks, and each puts a native app on Apple TV, Android TV and Fire TV so the VPN runs on the television rather than through a phone. Surfshark reliably reaches more than thirty Netflix regions and is particularly solid on the UK services that give VPNs the most trouble, BBC iPlayer and ITVX among them. NordVPN adds Nvidia Shield to the television list and is the faster of the two, which matters if you are pushing 4K through the tunnel. Both hand consoles a smart DNS setup, SmartPlay on one side and Smart DNS on the other, at no extra cost.
Torrenting is allowed on both, with Surfshark ahead on the letter of it: P2P works on every server in its network, while NordVPN allows it on its standard servers and adds P2P-optimised ones on top. Neither offers port forwarding. We could not find a streaming or downloading task that one handled and the other refused, and the two advantages cancel out, so this is a genuine draw rather than a diplomatic one.
Unlimited connections, and a router that costs you nothing.
Both have apps for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS, extensions for Chrome, Firefox and Edge, and 24/7 live chat. Then the numbers part company. NordVPN gives you ten simultaneous connections on every plan. Surfshark gives you an unlimited number, on every plan, and has done since launch. Count the things on your Wi-Fi that would benefit from a VPN, including the ones you do not think of as computers, and ten stops being generous quite quickly in a household of three or four people.
The router makes it worse for NordVPN. Both support manual installation on compatible firmware, and neither sells its own router. On Surfshark the router costs nothing, because there is no allowance to spend; on NordVPN it consumes one of your ten slots, so the move that is supposed to solve a device limit takes a tenth of it as a fee. For a single user with a phone and two laptops none of this matters. For anyone equipping a house, it is the round that decides the purchase, and the reason Surfshark is the one we recommend more often than our own scoreline would suggest.
Roughly twice the servers, and wider coverage on either measure.
NordVPN runs around 8,900 servers across 224 locations. Surfshark runs around 4,500 across 100 countries, which works out to roughly 140 locations. The two companies count differently, which is why the table labels each side with the unit it actually publishes, but the comparison survives either translation: NordVPN has about twice the servers and reaches more places. Both networks are entirely RAM-only, so a machine that is seized or simply unplugged loses its contents.
Server count on its own is a blunt instrument, since a small uncongested network can beat a large busy one, and Surfshark’s is not congested. The reason it decides a round is that capacity is what the other rounds are made of. More servers per location means less contention at peak hours, which is part of why NordVPN wins on speed, and specialty servers for Double VPN, Onion Over VPN and obfuscation exist only because there is spare capacity to dedicate to them. Surfshark’s network is big enough for everything most people do; NordVPN’s is bigger, and it shows up elsewhere on this page.
NordVPN is the better VPN of the two, and the gap is widest exactly where a VPN is supposed to be judged. It is faster in our data and in independent 2026 testing, it has been through six Deloitte no-logs engagements to Surfshark’s two, it operates from Panama rather than a Nine Eyes member state, and it runs roughly twice the network. Onion Over VPN and Meshnet have no Surfshark equivalent, and Threat Protection Pro scans downloads for malware rather than only blocking domains. The case against it is money and arithmetic: it costs more at every term, it renews at about $139 a year, and ten connections is a real ceiling in a house that has more than ten things on the Wi-Fi. If neither of those stops you, this is the stronger product.
Pros
Cons
Surfshark loses this comparison and remains the one most households should probably buy. It does not count your devices, on any plan, so the phones, laptops, tablets and televisions all sit behind one subscription with no slot arithmetic and no upgrade prompt. It is cheaper than NordVPN at every term and it renews at about $79 a year against roughly $139. Deloitte has verified the no-logs policy twice, and in April 2026 a Dutch court warrant proved it in the only way that counts: the company had nothing to hand over but the fact that the account existed. What it gives up is speed, network scale, half the audit history and the Panama jurisdiction, plus Onion Over VPN and Meshnet. That is a real list, and for a lot of people it is worth $60 a year and a few percent of bandwidth.
Pros
Cons
Every figure in the table comes from one of two places. Plan prices, server counts, device limits, protocols and the pros and cons are taken from our own review database, which is the same data behind the NordVPN and Surfshark review pages on this site, so this comparison cannot contradict them. Renewal prices, audit dates and scopes, the April 2026 Dutch warrant, the Dausos audit and the independent speed figures were verified against the providers’ own disclosures and contemporary coverage on September 7, 2026.
Rounds are decided on the facts in the table, not on overall impressions, and a round is a tie when the ticked rows come out level or when we could not find a task one provider handled and the other failed. Both companies belong to the same group, Nord Security, which we state on the page rather than bury. The links here are affiliate links and they fund the testing, but both providers pay commission and they pay it to the same parent, so there is no money in preferring one to the other. Neither provider saw this page before publication.
NordVPN, by four rounds to two. It is faster in our tests and in independent 2026 testing, it has six Deloitte no-logs engagements to Surfshark’s two, it is based in Panama rather than the Nine Eyes Netherlands, it runs about twice the network, and it offers Onion Over VPN and Meshnet that Surfshark has no equivalent for. Surfshark wins the two rounds that decide most purchases: it is cheaper at every term and renews at roughly half the price, and it places no limit on simultaneous devices. Streaming and torrenting are a draw. Buy NordVPN for the better VPN, Surfshark for the better deal and for covering a whole household.
Surfshark, at almost every point. Its two-year Starter plan is $2.49 a month against NordVPN’s $3.49 for Basic, and its one-year plan is $3.39 against $5.49. NordVPN is cheaper on one term only, month to month, at $14.99 against Surfshark’s $16.45. The difference that matters most is renewal: Surfshark Starter renews at about $79 a year while NordVPN Basic renews at roughly $139, so from the second term onward Surfshark costs about $60 a year less. Both offer a 30-day money-back guarantee.
Yes, by a modest but consistent margin. In our data NordVPN loses 16% of baseline throughput and Surfshark loses 20%, and independent 2026 testing found NordVPN averaging around 780 Mbps against Surfshark’s 680, retaining roughly 86% of an unprotected line against roughly 80%. Both run WireGuard at the core, so the gap comes from network capacity rather than the protocol. Surfshark launched its own protocol, Dausos, in 2026 with a claimed 30% speed improvement, and it may close the gap, but on today’s numbers NordVPN is the quicker of the two. On an ordinary home connection you are unlikely to notice either.
Yes. Surfshark merged with Nord Security in February 2022 under a common holding company, and both are ultimately owned by the same group. They continue to operate autonomously, with separate infrastructure, separate apps and separate engineering teams, and neither routes traffic through the other. It is worth knowing if you were choosing between them to spread your risk across two companies, because in corporate terms you would not be. It has no practical effect on which of the two is the better product for you.
Both are strong, and NordVPN is ahead. It is incorporated in Panama, which has no data-retention law and sits outside the intelligence-sharing alliances, and its no-logs policy has been verified by Deloitte six times since 2018, most recently across November and December 2025. Surfshark is in the Netherlands, a Nine Eyes member, with two Deloitte verifications, in 2023 and June 2025, and it retired its warrant canary in favour of quarterly transparency reports. Surfshark does hold one thing NordVPN cannot match: in April 2026 an Amsterdam District Court warrant compelled it to produce user data and all it could supply was confirmation the account existed plus payment details, because it stores no activity records.
NordVPN allows ten simultaneous connections, on every plan tier. Surfshark allows an unlimited number, also on every plan, which is its single biggest advantage in this comparison. Both let you install the VPN on a compatible router to cover every device in the house through one connection, and neither sells its own router hardware, but the maths differs: on Surfshark a router install costs nothing because there is no allowance to spend, while on NordVPN it consumes one of your ten slots.
Either will do the job. Both unblocked Netflix, Disney+, HBO Max, BBC iPlayer and Prime Video in our checks, and both have native apps for Apple TV, Android TV and Fire TV. Surfshark reaches more than thirty Netflix regions and is reliable on the UK services that block VPNs most aggressively; NordVPN is the faster of the two, which matters for 4K, and adds Nvidia Shield to its television lineup. We scored streaming as a tie because we could not find a service that one unblocked and the other did not. For a household streaming on several screens at once, Surfshark’s unlimited connections settle it.
Yes, within the refund window. Both offer a 30-day money-back guarantee on new subscriptions, so you can buy the other one, run it for a few weeks and refund whichever you like less. The trap on both sides is auto-renewal, because the intro price covers the first term only: turn renewal off in the account settings or put the date in a calendar, and check the renewal price before it charges. That advice matters more for NordVPN, at roughly $139 a year against Surfshark’s $79.